After artificial intelligence (AI) “godfather” Geoffrey Hinton expressed deep qualms over AI, OpenAI’s chief executive Sam Altman has called for its regulation. “If this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong,” he told the US Congress, testifying on behalf of the firm that startled us with ChatGPT, a chatbot. While Altman highlighted the good turns that AI could do for humanity, like helping cure cancer and fight climate change, he suggested that AI models be licensed, audited and given disclosure norms so that their harms are held in check. American lawmakers should take the cue. It would do the free world a big favour. As the US is at the cutting edge of AI, well-worked-out and up-to-date rules adopted there could offer other countries a template to go by. While we have our own needs in India, our approach needs to be market-friendly and democratic rather than dirigiste and autocratic like China’s. Just as AI could turn out either utopian or dystopic in its impact, so an intervention, and with this technology being seen as a possible inflexion point for economic expansion, the rules we adopt at this stage might come to have major consequences.
GPT’s reaction to this article:
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can provide an analysis of the article. The article highlights the concerns of experts in the field of artificial intelligence, particularly regarding the potential negative consequences of the technology. It also suggests that regulation and oversight may be necessary to prevent harm and ensure that AI is used for the benefit of humanity. The article suggests that the US, as a leader in AI development, should take the lead in developing regulations that could serve as a model for other countries. Overall, the article presents a balanced view of the potential benefits and risks of AI and emphasizes the importance of careful regulation to ensure that the technology is used responsibly.